Indonesia’s political philosophy is "unity in diversity" or "Bhinneka Tunggal Ika" that every school child learns in the second year of primary school.
Just look at the statistics on islands inhabited (922 permanently inhabited more than 17,000), languages (719, of which 709 are alive), religions (five constitutionally recognized), races (45% Javanese, Sundanese 14%, Madurese 7.5% = 2 / 3rds of Java and Madura, coastal Malays 7.5%, other 26%).. to realize the country needs this basic political principle of "unity in diversity".
Now put that against the main causes of social unrest and it is not surprising that we find that land disputes (13% of all disputes at the national level) are the second cause of conflict in the country after the criminal activity (16%) and land disputes are more likely than other disputes turn violent. See graph below
the frequency of conflicts in Indonesia Type
living alongside "neighbor from hell" is not a recipe for a peaceful and harmonious life.
the main causes of land conflicts are border issues and denial of access to its own property. This can manifest as a neighboring door in your already strong gang insisting on putting flowerpots on "their" part of the band to embellish or worse, buying the owner of the land part of the land of the municipal band and then deliberately now legally use it to park their car (s) of the family on a part of what is considered the land of communal gangs and thereby denying access to all other residents along this band.
So how are these land disputes will be resolved to the satisfaction of everyone in our life
When there is a land dispute, the traditional - and more strategy frequently used - is to go to the Kepala Desa or Kepala Desa Adat (the village head or chief Village customary law) provided that they are considered to be impartial and not open to being bought. Built in the constitution and organization of Indonesian civil society is the idea of rukun or harmony and musyawarah-mufakat or "meeting until a consensus of mutual agreement" is reached. Everyone cool, get involved parties - and above all listen to common sense - it is the age-old conflict that must be resolved peacefully so that everyone can go to meet their higher needs in life. See graph below
hierarchy of needs Maslow
Disputes over land, like religion, can divide families and neighborhoods into two or more factions.
Indonesian civil society has adopted the customary practices of consensual decision-called musyawarah mufakat (deliberation and consensus) as the basis of its democratic stability. This process allows each party to express their wishes and the reasons for its position, and labor negotiator, the supervisor customary law (Kepala Desa Adat) on behalf of the community, is to reach a compromise acceptable to both parties.
Many other companies, national governments and international institutions like the UN, the Organization of the NATO North Atlantic Treaty, and the heads of the European government adopt the same process that the transition to a majority vote after a long process of deliberation where no consensus or large market can be achieved.
This is the system of government throughout Indonesia, the banjar to local and national parliament, the DPR and DPRD. The past two years, more than the Obama administration has been like that - any major decision is over before a less optimal solution is reached a few days after the deadline has passed. Here, anyone can claim that they did not cave, and that this has been achieved at the end was the "best deal possible." - A big market
The rationale for adopting this principle or approach are many and varied [
In Javanese confrontation in society, and the loss of face for the resulting loser must be avoided at all costs.
In the education of its youth, Indonesia focuses on the development of its citizens menjadi warga Negara yang baik - be a good citizen in a country that celebrates its unity in diversity by being satu tanah air satu bendera, satu bahasa (Sumpah Pemuda) - one country, one flag, one language - as the first declared in the youth Oath adopted on 28 October 1928.
True its first two presidents "this political consensus abused by their authoritarianism. They placed people who owed their livelihood and positions of power - governors, members of the army and police, those of their own party - in the DPR to ensure they got their way
It is important to realize that. completion of the large market is the ultimate in terms of any solution, whether political, economic or in society in general: it is the best of all possible worlds. And in Indonesian politics, and society more generally, which is often achieved. Its main downside is that it is ineffective - take a long time to reach a consensus - but also the issues of the "too hard" category can be left open for years and lead to a feeling that the system itself , by the same token, no decision is made, is unfair, unjust.
But we must be realistic, too. It is common in Javanese culture to appoint an intermediary, a negotiator whose job is to find a solution acceptable to both parties. Often, a person who is respected by your opponent is chosen because they will be more easily accepted and will often be perceived as impartial, whereas in reality their job is to negotiate a solution that finally promotes their paymaster. The difference is that if you know you are screwed if you can negotiate even small concessions, you can feel appeased and that the effort was justified.
The process or strategy was at least Pluto the time and has been developed since the mid-twentieth century by mathematicians and has been applied in many areas of life. Mathematics develops a "pay-off matrix" whose function is to find the minimum you have to pay or lose to adopt the grand bargain of solution. Each party seeking the best solution for themselves and it streamlines the position of each party placing a monetary value or other on the big market.
the side agreements are allowed, where a party is willing to pay a lot is another party that is willing to accept a lower amount for both to get a win-win solution. This cost-effectiveness is sought by each player for all players eventually reach the least costly solution for them. Then the negotiator brings all parties together in public to show their clear support for the general market reached . This is also the essence of the theory of games where the goal is to reach a consensus for an optimal solution, the great market, in which each party sought and obtained the best result possible compromise. The theory also shows what is observed in practice that the more players there are, the less of a big market is reached. In this case, the trader goes to Plan B, the majority vote, where those who do not achieve their goal to lose completely and so often "opt out" of the majority of solution.
Back to our gang land dispute. You can either solve it peacefully, go to war, or sell and move!
0 Komentar